5 Comments
May 28Liked by B.J. Mendelson

Members of our NYS Legislature may not want to enact a brand new tax (or fee) on their home owning constituents who are already angry about property taxes and the cost of living.

Especially with Election Day just 5 months away.

Especially here in Monroe where our Town Supervisor locked us into a 30 year bond for $19.5 million which is essentially paying for land preservation.

Please note, I am a paid subscriber and I read every word of your gonzo (forgive the 1960’s reference) journalism. No one else is “telling it like it is”.

Dan Burke

Elder Statesman

Expand full comment
author

I appreciate the Hunter S. Thompson reference. That's exactly what I'm going for. :-)

And, that's very true. I think the State-Wide bill should be a bit more clear in its language that it's granting the option to tax via a public referendum rather than just allowing them to institute a tax.

Expand full comment
founding

Although it is called a tax, the Community Preservation Fund in Warwick actually collects a fee, during closing, for a specific service: Preservation.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for the heads-up Derek. I did not know that!

Expand full comment
founding

Brandon,

Thanks for shining the light on this important issue of enabling and empowering residents to be able to vote on whether they want a Community Preservation Fund funded by Transfer fees on real estate closings in their communities to preserve some of their open spaces in Orange County. Unfortunately, Democrats are preventing their constituents from simply having a voice on this very important issue. For some reason, the fee which is dedicated to a specific service, is incorrectly referred to as a tax. Either way, no matter what it is called, residents should have the right to decide whether they want a Preservation Fund in their community.

Expand full comment